Feedloader (Clickability)

About 65.5 million year ago, the last of the non-avian dinosaurs were wiped the end in the fallout from one of the earth"s many catastrophic extinction events. They left just bones and also traces in the absent behind. Yet there are human being who insurance claim that human beings actually lived alongside dinosaurs. Young planet creationists have actually a habit that twisting natural history to fit within the narrow confines of their translate of Genesis, and also they insist that people once co-existed with sauropods, tyrannosaurs, ceratopsians and also other dinosaurs within the last 6,000 year or so.

You are watching: Cave drawings of dinosaurs and humans

To support their fantastical claims, part creationists cite what they think to be miscellaneous sculptures, carvings and also other creative representations the dinosaurs do by old cultures roughly the world. Most of these have actually been discredited as forgeries and also misinterpreted objects, however creationists proceed to use them as evidence for their strange view of planet history. Among the many oft-cited is a petroglyph the what appears to it is in an Apatosaurus-like sauropod top top Kachina leg in Utah"s natural Bridges nationwide Monument. According to the fundamentalist-apologist group Answers in Genesis, "The petroglyph the a sauropod dinosaur plainly has vital implications—indicating that dinosaurs were without doubt known to men after the Flood until they eventually died out and became (apparently) extinct." The assumption is that the petroglyph to be intentionally sculpted by people to stand for a solitary animal that human being had actually checked out walking roughly the see in the recent past. A document just published by paleontologists Phil Senter and Sally Cole demolishes this argument.

Have you ever watched the clouds go by and also thought you saw one in the shape of an animal, or seen the "man in the moon"? this are instances of pareidolia—seeing what we believe to it is in a significant shape or pattern once it isn"t really there. This phenomenon additionally explains the "dinosaur" on Kachina Bridge. Top top close investigate by Senter and Cole, the "sauropod dinosaur" turned out to be made up of distinct carvings and also mud stains. The is certainly not a relenten of a single animal, and, perceived in detail, that looks nothing favor a dinosaur. The different carvings and also mud stains just look favor a dinosaur come those wishing to uncover one there.

See more: Cost Of Frame Off Restoration Ford Bronco Restoration Guide, Cost Of Body Shop Frame Up Restoration

While absolutely the many prominent, the claimed sauropod was not the just dinosaur carving creationists assumed they experienced on the bridge. Three various other dinosaur depictions have actually been claimed to exist, however Senter and Cole conveniently debunked these, as well. One of the "dinosaurs" was nothing however a dirt stain; a propose Triceratops was simply a composite that petroglyphs that execute not stand for animals, and what has actually been described as a carving the Monoclonius was nothing more than one enigmatic squiggle. There are no dinosaur piece on Kachina Bridge.

The Kachina bridge petroglyphs were no hoaxes or frauds. Lock were carved by civilization who once stayed in the region, but there is no clues that any kind of of them represent animals, living or extinct. What creationists assumed they observed in the rocks has turned out to it is in an illusion, but I wonder how countless of them will certainly actually admit their mistake?


Senter, P.; Cole, S.J. (2011). "Dinosaur" petroglyphs in ~ Kachina bridge site, organic Bridges national Monument, southeastern Utah: not dinosaurs after every Palaeontologia Electronica, 14 (1), 1-5