The MPAA and some 30 media carriers supported debates that Ventura shouldn"t collect for unjust enrichment end Kyle"s bar fight description.

You are watching: Chris kyle jesse ventura bill o’reilly


Pub Date: Jan. 2012 | copies Sold: 288,000 | film Rights: Bradley Cooper's 22 & Indiana Pictures

The 8th Circuit Court the Appeals has thrown the end a $1.8 million court success by former Minnesota Gov. Jesse Ventura over chris Kyle’s book, American Sniper: The Autobiography that the most Lethal Sniper in U.S. Military History.

In the book, Kyle defines punching a “celebrity” who he describes as “Scruff Face” in 2006 in ~ a bar whereby some friends had actually gathered after ~ the funeral that a marine Seal. In an interview v Fox News’ bill O’Reilly, which happened before Clint Eastwood adjusted the book into a mega-successful film starring Bradley Cooper, Kyle stated it to be Ventura who he had punched. In 2013, Kyle died, made it through by his mam Taya.

Ventura refuse the incident occurred and sued Kyle and also publishers for defamation, misappropriation and unjust enrichment. The case went to trial in 2014, and on the 5th day of deliberations, the jury reached a 8-2 verdict in favor of Ventura top top the defamation claim, awarding $500,000 while recommending $1.35 million an ext for unjust enrichment. The judge adopted the recommendation.

The situation then went to appeal where it brought forth the Motion photo Association the America and also some 30media companies suggesting that an award of profits from the book for unjust enrichment would certainly be “unjustified” and also have a “potentially crippling” result on the first Amendment.

In today’s opinion, the 8 hours Circuit poll 2-1 to set aside the $500,000 defamation award since of improper and prejudicial testimony about Kyle’s insurance. The commonwealth appeals court remanded the defamation claim for a brand-new trial.

See more: Ecommerce Check Out One Word Or Two, Definition Of Checkout

It’s theunjust enrichment reversal, though, that’s unanimous and going come be received warmly through media companies, as the ruling decides that loss for defamation constitutes an adequate legal remedy.

“Neither the district court no one Ventura cited any case awarding earnings in a defamation situation under one unjust-enrichment theory, or even suggesting money damages space an insufficient remedy in a public-figure defamation case,” says the opinion authored by 8th Circuit Judge william Jay Riley. “We find none … we cannot expropriate Ventura’s unjust-enrichment theory, due to the fact that it enjoys no legal support under Minnesota law.”