President Trump’s and congressional Republicans’ budgets cut programs that ensure a straightforward standard of living because that veterans and their families.

You are watching: Congress vote to cut veterans benefits


*
*
*
*
*
An Iraq war veteran walks previous an American flag at an apartment complex in Midway City, California, respectable 14, 2017. (AP/Jae C. Hong)

This issue brief contains a correction.

Despite vowing to support America’s veterans, chairman Donald Trump and congressional Republican leaders have put forth budget proposals that are poised come do good damage to the financial security that veterans and their families—all to pay for taxation cuts because that millionaires and also corporations.1 In fact, for every $2 the the cut Trump wants to do to services and benefits for veterans, which will total much more than $154 billion end the next decade, trump card plans come give more 보다 $3 come the adult kids of millionaires and billionaires.*2

And these cuts are simply the pointer of the iceberg.

Despite the common belief to the contrary, veteran-specific benefits and services fall quick of conference the needs of veterans and their families, plenty of of whom battle to meet straightforward needs even with room of Veterans to work (VA) supports.3 more than 3.9 million veterans live paycheck come paycheck—meaning their family members incomes are less than twice the commonwealth poverty level, or much less than $50,000 for a family of four.4 Yet brand-new CAP analysis reveals the if Trump’s proposed cut to crucial job training programs were applied directly to regimen participation, much more than 340,000 veterans could lose accessibility to an essential employment solutions that assist boost wages.

Additionally, CAP approximates that end the following decade, 400,000 veterans ~ above average might lose access to critical nutrition assistance each year if the cut proposed in chairman Trump’s budget plan were applied directly come participation in the Supplemental Nutrition help Program (SNAP). If instead the cut proposed in the house of representatives Republican budget plan were applied, more than 554,000 veterans might lose SNAP every year in between 2023 and 2027. Previous congressional Republican attempts come repeal and replace the Affordable treatment Act (ACA) would certainly have cost close to half a million veterans your Medicaid benefits by 2026.5 and also the most recent repeal effort, which provides devastating changes to Medicaid,6 would certainly be also worse, costing an estimated 579,000 veterans their Medicaid coverage in ~ a decade.7

This analysis largely focuses on chairman Trump’s budget because the budget put soon by conference leaders contains fewer details, make it difficult to understand in many instances specifically how the would damage veterans. Yet the all at once size the the spending cut that conference leaders space proposing—coupled v their substantial proposed tax cuts—would do it virtually difficult for veterans and also their families to escape unscathed.

Here space the five ways in which Trump’s and also the congressional majority’s budgets deceptively weaken the defense of veterans and their families, even if it is it is their capacity to uncover work, stay healthy, or store a roof over their heads.

1. Making it harder because that veterans to discover jobs

President Trump started his assault on veterans’ tasks when he very first took office by instituting a rental freeze because that the commonwealth government. This frozen disproportionately influenced veterans, that are crucial part that the commonwealth workforce. Virtually one-third of federal employees rental in 2015 were veterans, and also close to fifty percent of these to be veterans through disabilities.8

Now, despite promising come invest more9 in training methods for veterans, the Trump budget plan would do it more challenging for veterans to accessibility essential job training and employment services. The general public workforce system, authorized by the workforce Innovation and also Opportunity act (WIOA), serves practically 1 million veterans every year, giving services such together career development, job training, and also job search assistance.10 however the trump administration’s proposed spending plan cuts would result in countless veterans losing accessibility to this programs and services.

In 2015, for example, the WIOA adult, dislocated worker, and also youth programs served more than 80,000 veterans.11 The Trump spending plan would cut resources for these solutions by 43 percent indigenous 2015 levels, an interpretation that an ext than 34,000 veterans might lose accessibility to important services.12 The Trump budget would also cut the Wagner-Peyser Employment business by 36 percent native 2015 levels.13 This company provides labor-exchange solutions to jobseekers, including 858,000 veterans. Together a result, almost 309,000 veterans might lose access to Wagner-Peyser services.14 These cuts overshadow any kind of slight investments the management has proposed for training and also employment programs that particularly target veterans, such as the Homeless Veterans’ Reintegration Program.15

2. To reduce veterans’ accessibility to health and wellness care

Contrary to well-known belief, no all veterans room eligible for, enrolled in, or even completely covered by the VA’s health treatment system.16 In actuality, many veterans and also their families depend on private health insurance,17 i beg your pardon covers 13.6 million veterans,18 or public insurance such as Medicaid, come which virtually 1.8 million veterans turn for coverage.19 follow to a current report by the urban Institute and the Robert lumber Johnson Foundation, under the ACA, the variety of uninsured veterans decreased virtually 40 percent between 2013 and 2015 thanks mainly to the ACA’s development of medical allowance coverage.20 These critical health coverage benefit for very vulnerable veterans and also their households will it is in wiped out need to Congress’ recent ACA repeal efforts end up being law.21 Under previous conference repeal proposals, nearly half a million veterans would have actually lost Medicaid benefits by 2026.22 The recent ACA repeal effort—referred to as the Graham-Cassidy bill after its 2 lead sponsors—is even an ext radical: it stops funding for the ACA’s Medicaid growth after 2026 and also caps the staying Medicaid program. This proposal is approximated to cost 579,000 veterans their Medicaid coverage through 2027.23

And the is not exclusively veterans covered by medical allowance who are at risk. The necessary health services (EHBs) that numerous veterans and also their family members depend ~ above to support their requirements resulting indigenous service-connected disabilities, to recover from illness, and to stay healthy remain under threat.24 Graham-Cassidy would permit states to waive the EHB requirements, and undermine the ACA’s protections for world with pre-existing conditions. Due to the fact that of these changes, some veterans and their families could confront sky-high premium increases. The potential toy fee of these terrible actions spearheaded through the Trump management not only reveals Trump’s deceitful betrayal of veterans but also eviscerates his insurance claim that that is boosting veterans’ accessibility to timely, top quality care.25

3. Acquisition away supports and services native veterans v disabilities

President Trump’s proposed $72 billion in deep cuts to the nation’s special needs supports over the following decade would additionally be devastating for veterans.26 nearly 1 million veterans obtained Social Security handicap Insurance services in 2013,27 however President Trump desires to add much more red tape that would make that harder for world with disabilities to access the benefits they have earned.28 cuts to Social security would be on peak of president Trump’s budget proposal to remove the individual Unemployability benefits program, which patent the VA to carry out benefits in ~ the 100 percent-disabled price to veterans who space unable to acquire a job due to the fact that of service-connected disabilities, even if their special needs is no rated in ~ the 100 percent level.29

This proposed elimination—which was placed on host in response to fierce opposition native veterans groups—would reduced disability services for older veterans, including more than 225,000 veterans at this time receiving benefits.30 Additionally, chairman Trump has actually proposed removed the limb Loss resource Center and also the Paralysis resource Center,31 both of which provide essential assistance for veterans, who are disproportionately likely to it is in paralyzed and have elevated rates of traumatic amputation.32

4. Increasing veteran hunger and also food insecurity

Veterans and also their families comprise a sizeable share of Americans dealing with food insecurity.33 In a recent long-term study of veterans, practically 1 in 4 participants skilled food insecurity and also were an ext likely to have difficulty staying healthy and balanced as a result. Inadequate nutrition can additionally exacerbate chronic health problems such together diabetes, hypertension, and also depression.34 new CAP evaluation reveals that in 2015, almost 1.5 million veterans live in family members that relied top top SNAP benefits to store themselves and also their households healthy and also fed. If applied through a palliation in the variety of people participating in the program, the reduced of virtually $200 billion that Trump proposed because that SNAP end the next decade might snatch vital nutrition assistance away native an median of 400,000 veterans per year—needlessly exposing them come the risks of hunger and malnourishment.35

The House budget delivers an almost equally destructive blow to SNAP, cutting $154 billion over 10 years.36 But because the House majority budget concentrates its cut in the last years the the budget window—slashing projected SNAP spending by 42 percent in between 2023 and also 2027—its arrangement could result in an even greater variety of veterans losing accessibility in those years: every told, an ext than 554,000 veterans can lose SNAP coverage each year between 2023 and 2027.37

5. Increasing veteran homelessness and housing insecurity

Nearly two-thirds the the civilization reported as homeless or living in house in the 2016 single-night census performed by the U.S. Room of Housing and also Urban advancement (HUD) were veterans.38 Rental aid is an essential in help veterans afford kind housing and also in preventing and also reducing veteran homelessness. An ext than 340,000 low-income veterans got rental assistance, which plays a significant role in reducing veterans’ homelessness, in march 2014.39 some veterans obtain rental help through the HUD-Veterans to work Supportive real estate (HUD-VASH) voucher program, which combines rental help for homeless veterans with case management and also clinical services listed by the VA.40 because 2008, this regimen has listed 85,000 veterans and their households with housing assistance.41 Mayors throughout the nation—in coordination through federal agencies and also local nonprofits, community-based organizations, and public housing authorities—have made significant progress towards the goal of ending homelessness amongst veterans and also their families.42 Veteran homelessness declined an estimated 47 percent between 2010 and 2016.43

Yet existing affordable housing and homelessness avoidance initiatives provide support for only a small share of veterans.44 president Trump’s agenda intimidates to make veterans’ real estate insecurity even worse by targeting rental assistance programs because that cuts.45 His proposed spending plan cuts to the Housing an option Voucher regime would most likely reduce the capability to purchased housing and also avoid homelessness amongst veterans who do not receive help through the HUD-VASH program.46 Trump’s proposed cut to various other programs—such as the ar 811 Supportive real estate for Persons through Disabilities program, the public Housing resources Fund, the Community development Block grant (CDBG) program, and also the National real estate Trust Fund—could have actually outsized results for veterans together well.47 Although this programs room not designed solely to target veterans’ real estate needs, castle do provide low-income veterans with crucial resources.

The 2016 American neighborhood Survey suggests that much more than 5.3 million veterans have actually disabilities. That these, an ext than half a million live listed below the commonwealth poverty line.48 Low-income veterans v disabilities are amongst those eligible because that housing assistance through the ar 811 program, which supports the development of affordable, easily accessible housing for civilization with disabilities. The ar 811 program, however, would certainly be downsized under Trump’s budget proposal.49 The proposed spending plan would also affect veterans that reside in public housing units in need of major repairs. The proposed cuts to the public Housing funding Fund—the main source of federal capital for the conservation of windy housing—could mean that many struggling veterans residents in distressed public housing units would proceed to live in unsafe dwellings.50 Further, through slashing capital for the CDBG program and also the National housing Trust Fund, the proposed spending plan would significantly curtail local anti-homelessness efforts to construct and carry out affordable housing and also supportive services for veterans.51

The trump card agenda additionally calls because that the removed of the Legal solutions Corporation (LSC), which offers low-income people with civil legal help to reconnect lock with critical benefits and services that, among many things, can help them stay in your homes, struggle discriminatory business practices, and escape abusive environments.52 much more than 1.7 million veterans space income-eligible because that LSC services.53 last year alone, LSC-funded organizations functioned on approximately 41,000 polite legal instances involving family members that included veterans struggling to do ends meet.54 The polite legal troubles that countless of these delicate veterans confront often said to your discharge status, barriers to treatment for service-related health and wellness issues, and also denied business benefits.55

Conclusion

Both veterans and their families have make sacrifices because that this country. The united States must commit to meeting their cumulative needs and ensuring familial care after service members leave energetic duty. Cutting solutions that directly impact veterans would be a dual betrayal, as both veterans and their family members would suffer if programs that support their an easy living needs were slashed.

*Correction, September 29, 2017: This issue short has been updated to reflect president Trump’s latest taxes plan.

Katherine Gallagher Robbins is the director of family members policy because that the poverty to Prosperity routine at the facility for American Progress.

See more: 20 Best Chemical Plant Operator Jobs In Louisiana, United States (2 New)

 Rejane Frederick is an combine director for the poor to Prosperity regimen at the Center. Angela Hanks is the combine director of Workforce advance Policy at the Center. Rachel West is an combine director for the poverty to Prosperity regime at the Center. Michela Zonta is a senior policy analyst for Housing and also Consumer Finance policy at the Center.