A fabricated quotation about guns attributed come California Sen. Dianne Feinstein has actually circulated online for years and is again being mutual by thousands on Facebook.

You are watching: Dianne feinstein one day the american people will know their place



A most gray area surrounding the political rhetoric around the White House’s decision come swap Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl for 5 Taliban figures detained at Guantanamo.


Q: walk Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s husband, Richard Blum, own a company that has actually an to exclude, contract to market United claims Postal business property?A: Blum has an interest in the CBRE Group, which winner a compete contract to offer postal facilities. That is its plank chairman and also owns an invest firm that holds much less than 5 percent the its stock.


Did Sen. Dianne Feinstein to speak all armed forces veterans space mentally ill and should not be permitted to very own guns?

On Connecticut windy Broadcasting, managing Editor Lori Robertson talks around how both sides of the gun-control debate are selectively quoting from research studies on the efficiency of the 1994 attack weapons ban. The head of the NRA, Wayne LaPierre, claimed the studies uncovered the ban “had no affect on lowering crime,” while democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein stated the half did reduce crime. Both are wrong. The studies might not conclude the the ban was responsible for a national drop in total violence,


TheTeaParty.net falsely claims in an email that Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s proposed attack weapons ban would certainly exempt “all federal government officials” indigenous the ban. While the bill would exempt military and law enforcement officials, it would certainly not exempt legislators or administrative staff.The email further misrepresents the proposed bill, claiming the “she wants to take her handguns, rifles and other weapons away indigenous you.” In fact, the proposal would grandfather in all of the existing tools owned by Americans,

Both sides in the gun debate are misusing scholastic reports ~ above the influence of the 1994 assault weapons ban, cherry-picking portions out of context to fit their arguments.

See more: Consumer Reports Most Reliable Cars 2016 : Best Cars Of The Year

Wayne LaPierre, chief executive, management officer the the national Rifle Association, told a Senate committee the the “ban had no impact on lowering crime.” however the researches cited by LaPierre concluded that results of the half were “still unfolding” as soon as it expired in 2004 and also that it to be “premature to make definitive assessments that the ban’s affect on pistol violence.”

In an online interview advocated by the White House, Vice chairman Joe Biden made the false case that “there to be fewer police being murdered … as soon as the assault weapons ban, in fact, remained in existence.” however the FBI statistics top top killings of legislation enforcement officers show no such trend.In fact, the number of officers eliminated when the half was still in impact in 2002 — 56 — is the exact same number as in 2010. The numbers have actually fluctuated,

Q: exactly how do human being who have actually not been vaccinated versus COVID-19 posture a hazard to civilization who have been vaccinated?

A: an unvaccinated human who is infected v COVID-19 poses a much greater risk to others who are also unvaccinated. But vaccines space not 100% effective, so over there is a chance that an unvaccinated person can infect a vaccinated human — specifically the vulnerable, such as elderly and also immunocompromised individuals.

SciCheck's COVID-19/Vaccination task Preempting and exposing vaccination and COVID-19 misinformation.
Proyecto de Vacunación/COVID-19 Precaviendo y exponiendo la desinformación sobre el COVID-19 y sus vacunas